GRC: Governance, risk management and compliance for companies
GRC (Governance, Risk Management, and Compliance) explained: define a framework, choose supporting tools, and align with ISO 27001, NIS2, and GDPR.
Table of Contents (5 sections)
GRC - Governance, Risk Management, and Compliance - is a systematic approach to ensuring that an organization pursues its strategic goals (Governance), identifies and manages risks (Risk Management), and meets regulatory requirements (Compliance). The key is integration: rather than operating three separate silos, modern GRC takes a unified approach.
What GRC Means - and What It Doesn’t
The three pillars of GRC:
G - Governance:
→ Strategic alignment of IT and security
→ Who has what responsibilities?
→ Define policies, standards, and processes
→ Involve leadership: Security is a top priority!
→ Tools: Security policies, RACI matrix, KPIs
R - Risk Management:
→ Identify, assess, and manage risks
→ What threats does the company face?
→ Acceptable risk vs. risk requiring action
→ Residual risk after implementing measures
→ Tools: Risk register, ISMS risk analysis (ISO 27005)
C - Compliance:
→ Adherence to external requirements (laws, standards)
→ GDPR, NIS2, KRITIS, ISO 27001, PCI DSS, HIPAA...
→ Proof of compliance (audits, certifications)
→ Difference: Compliance ≠ Security! (only minimum standard)
What GRC is NOT:
→ GRC is not a substitute for technical security measures
→ "We are ISO 27001 certified" ≠ "We are secure"
→ GRC without technical implementation is worthless (paper compliance)
The GRC Problem Without an Integrated Approach
Typical situation without GRC integration:
ISO 27001 project (IT department):
→ Develops policies, risk analysis, awareness training
GDPR project (Data Protection Officer):
→ Record of processing activities, privacy policy, TOMs
NIS2 project (Compliance Manager):
→ Reporting processes, supplier assessment
Result:
→ Three separate risk analyses (for ISO, GDPR, NIS2)!
→ Three separate policy documents
→ Triple the effort during audits
→ Contradictory statements in different documents
→ No one has an overall view of the risk landscape
Integrated GRC:
→ One risk analysis → covers ISO 27001, GDPR, NIS2
→ Control mapping: "This measure fulfills ISO A.8.5 + GDPR Art. 32"
→ Single source of truth for all compliance requirements
→ Efficiency: one audit for multiple standards possible (ISMS + DSMS)
Building a GRC Framework
Step 1: Requirements Inventory
Which regulatory requirements apply?
Legally mandatory:
□ GDPR (all companies in the EU)
□ NIS2 (if a critical/important entity)
□ KRITIS Regulation (KRITIS operators)
□ Industry-specific: BAIT (banks), KAIT (insurance)
Contractually required:
□ ISO 27001 (required by customers or in tenders)
□ PCI DSS (credit card acceptance)
□ SOC 2 (U.S. market, cloud services)
□ TISAX (Automotive)
Voluntary/Best Practice:
□ BSI IT-Grundschutz
□ CIS Controls
□ NIST Cybersecurity Framework
---
Step 2: Select Control Framework
ISO 27001:2022 (recommended):
→ 93 controls across 4 domains + Annex A
→ Globally recognized, certifiable
→ Covers the foundation for GDPR/NIS2
CIS Controls v8 (alternative, especially for SMEs):
→ 18 control groups, prioritized
→ Implementation Groups 1-3 (based on size and maturity)
→ More technology-focused than ISO 27001
NIST CSF 2.0 (2024):
→ 6 functions: Govern, Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, Recover
→ Flexible, not certifiable but widely referenced
→ Free, publicly available
---
Step 3: Build a risk register
Risk Register Structure:
Risk ID | Risk Description | Threat | Vulnerability | Probability | Impact | Risk Score | Mitigations | Residual Risk | Owner
Assessment Matrix (simplified 3x3):
Impact:
Low Medium High
Prob. High: M H KR
Medium: N M H
Low: N N M
KR = Critical (immediate action required)
H = High (prompt action required)
M = Medium (scheduled action required)
N = Low (acceptable or monitoring)
Typical Top 10 Risks (SMEs):
1. Ransomware attack (High, High = Critical)
2. Phishing → Credential compromise (High, High = Critical)
3. Insider threat (Medium, High = High)
4. Unpatched vulnerabilities (High, Medium = High)
5. Data loss due to backup failure (Medium, High = High)
6. Supply chain compromise (Low, High = Medium)
7. DDoS against online presence (Medium, Medium = Medium)
8. Loss of mobile devices (High, Medium = High)
9. BEC/CEO fraud (Medium, High = High)
10. Compliance violation/GDPR fine (Low, Critical = High)
---
Step 4: Define policies and standards
Policy hierarchy:
Level 1: Information Security Policy (Top-level, signed by the CEO)
Level 2: Standards (Password policy, encryption standard)
Level 3: Procedures/Processes (Incident Response Process, Patch Procedure)
Level 4: Work Instructions (Step-by-Step for IT)
Key Policies:
□ Information Security Policy
□ Acceptable Use Policy
□ Password Policy
□ Access Control Policy
□ Incident Response Policy
□ Business Continuity / Disaster Recovery Policy
□ Data Classification Policy
□ Vendor Management Policy (Vendor Security)
□ Remote Work Policy
□ BYOD Policy
GRC Tools for Different Sizes
Small Businesses (< 50 Employees):
Risk management without a tool:
→ Excel/Google Sheets: Risk register, control matrix
→ Word: Policies, procedural instructions
→ SharePoint/Confluence: Document management
→ Cost: 0 (apart from time spent)
Advantage: Flexible, no licensing costs
Disadvantage: Manual versioning, no dashboards
---
Mid-sized companies (50-500 employees):
verinice (open-source ISMS tool):
→ Free basic version
→ BSI IT-Grundschutz and ISO 27001 templates
→ Risk management, action tracking
→ GDPR module available
Enginsight (DACH provider):
→ Vulnerability management + GRC combined
→ NIS2 compliance module
→ German hosting infrastructure (GDPR)
DocuWare / ELO (document management):
→ Versioning, workflow-based approvals
→ Audit-proof archiving
---
Enterprise (500+ employees):
ServiceNow GRC:
→ Leading enterprise platform
→ Integrated risk, policy, and audit management
→ CMDB integration
→ Very expensive, but comprehensive
SAP GRC:
→ For SAP environments
→ Access control, process control, risk management
→ Integration into the SAP landscape
Archer (RSA):
→ Market leader for complex GRC requirements
→ Highly configurable
---
ISMS-specific tools:
DataGuard (DACH provider):
→ ISO 27001 + GDPR platform
→ Guided implementation
→ Automated compliance checks
Vanta (for SaaS companies):
→ SOC 2, ISO 27001, GDPR automation
→ Continuous monitoring of technical controls
→ Well-suited for cloud-native companies
GRC and regulatory mapping
Control mapping: One measure, many standards
Example: Encryption at rest
ISO 27001:2022: A.8.24 Use of cryptography
GDPR Art. 32: (1)(a) Pseudonymization and encryption
BSI IT-Grundschutz: CON.1 Cryptographic concept
NIS2: Art. 21 (2)(d) Supply chain security
→ One measure (hard drive encryption) = 4 requirements met!
→ In the GRC tool: Link the measure to all 4 controls
Compliance calendar:
January: ISO 27001 management review
March: Prepare GDPR data protection report
April: ISO 27001 internal audit (preparation for recertification)
June: Risk analysis update
September: NIS2 reporting (if applicable)
October: ISO 27001 surveillance audit (annual)
December: Annual security awareness training
KPIs for GRC reporting:
→ Open security vulnerabilities: Trend (increasing or decreasing?)
→ Patch compliance: % of systems up to date
→ Action implementation rate: open items from risk analysis
→ Policy read rate: have all employees confirmed policies?
→ Awareness training completion rate
→ Incident response time: MTTD, MTTR
→ Audit findings: number of open findings Questions about this topic?
Our experts advise you free of charge and without obligation.
About the Author
Dipl.-Math. (WWU Münster) and doctoral candidate at the Promotionskolleg NRW (Hochschule Rhein-Waal), researching phishing awareness, behavioral security and nudging in IT security. Responsible for building and maintaining ISMS, leads internal audits to ISO/IEC 27001:2022 and advises as an external information security officer (ISB) in KRITIS sectors. Lecturer for Communication Security at Hochschule Rhein-Waal and NIS2 training lead at isits AG.
3 Publikationen
- Different Seas, Different Phishes - Large-Scale Analysis of Phishing Simulations Across Different Industries (2025)
- Self-promotion with a Chance of Warnings: Exploring Cybersecurity Communication Among Government Institutions on LinkedIn (2024)
- Exploring the Effects of Cybersecurity Awareness and Decision-Making Under Risk (2024)